Dominion Identifies Alternative Routes for Atlantic Coast Pipeline

ACP_AlternativesBy Rachael Smith, Nelson County Times

Dominion Resources has identified new potential alternate routes for the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline that, if approved and built, would transport natural gas from West Virginia southward through Nelson County and into North Carolina.

Dominion Resources Director of Communications Jim Norvelle said letters were planned to be sent Monday to landowners along the alternate routes seeking permission to survey.

“Surveys are the only way to understand fully the potential benefits and constraints of these potential alternatives,” he said.

On March 5, Dominion will host an informational open house on the alternate routes. A time and location have not been determined.

The alternate routes are in addition to the proposed route, Norvelle said.

“These alternatives are a natural part of the routing process,” he said.

After conversations with local, state and federal officials, and landowners, Dominion has developed these potential alternate routes.

“It is consistent with our promise to work with all parties to find the best route with the least impacts to people, the environment, and historic and cultural resources,” he said. “It also is consistent with what we have done elsewhere along the proposed route.”

The four alternates include the “Appalachian Trail South,” “East of Lovingston,” “East of Lovingston Connector,” and “Wingina” routes.

Norvelle said the Atlantic Coast Pipeline must cross the Appalachian Trail because it continues from West Virginia through Virginia and onto North Carolina.

“Many other natural gas pipelines, electric transmission lines and other infrastructure projects already cross the trail,” he said. “Our proposed route has a constructible crossing that we believe minimizes any potential impact on the trail and its surrounding area.”

>> Construction for the “Appalachian Trail South” alternative would cross several more roads, but would be 1.5 miles shorter and cross about 10 fewer bodies of water than the proposed route, Norvelle said.

“Surveying this alternate route would affect 155 new tracts of land; 95 in Augusta and 60 in Nelson,” he said.

>> The “East of Lovingston” route would avoid areas identified by The Nature Conservancy as critical habitat in Davis Creek, an area hit the hardest by Hurricane Camille in 1969.

“Many Nelson County landowners and residents have asked us to consider avoiding the areas damaged by Hurricane Camille in planning the ACP route,” Norvelle said. “This alternate route would straighten out the proposed route east of Lovingston, the Nelson County seat, and is about five miles shorter than the proposed route. Ninety-five new tracts of land would be affected.”

>> The “East of Lovingston Connector” would be about 5.4 miles long and would affect 15 new tracts of land. If the “Appalachian Trail South” route is chosen, the pipeline would have to rejoin with the original proposed route or connect with the “East of Lovingston” route, Norvelle said.

>> The “Wingina” route would move the original proposed route to avoid the Norwood-Wingina Historic District and would shorten the length of the route through Nelson by one mile and cross the James River under a narrower section, about three miles northeast of the proposed route. This route would affect 16 new tracts of land.

Norvelle said Dominion has yet to decide on which route will be submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which ultimately will approve or deny the project.

Dominion has said it plans to submit its final FERC application this summer.

Before Dominion can submit a final route, surveyors will need to study and analyze the alternates as well as complete survey work on the current proposed route.

Norvelle said throughout the development of the project, Dominion’s construction, engineering and environmental teams have reviewed and evaluated more then 3,000 miles of route variations.

The first steps in evaluating route alternatives are to identify and try to avoid potential constraints and to conduct surveys and environmental surveys along the potential alternative route corridor, Norvelle said.

“In almost all cases, evaluation of alternate routes is an exercise of balancing competing constraints,” he said. “Identifying the least impactful route is always the objective. And, building and operating safely is our paramount concern.”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s